Simulation in action or an illusion act of legal nominalism
PDF (Limba Română)
HTML (Limba Română)

Keywords

simulation
opposability
effects of simulation on third parties or acquirers
conventional simulation action en simulation
dénoncer la simulation
inopposabilité
opposabilité
situation des tiers et des ayants cause à la simulation
simulation conventionnelle acțiunea în simulație
denunțarea simulației
inopozabilitate
opozabilitate
situația terților și a avânzilor-cauză în raport cu simulația
simulație convențională

Abstract

The Romanian Civil Code of 2011 assigned to the legal institution of simulation more articles than the previous Civil Code but, at the same time, imposed the use of fourteen new public registries dedicated to the publicity of rights. Contradiction in terms? Given this legal basis, it remains to be seen in practice whether simulation remains possible in the face of this legal nominalism and if the legal action brought on the grounds of simulation is nevertheless feasible. We hold on to the idea, previously stated that the legal action based on simulation does not have a distinct functional or practical purpose beyond the fulfilment of the plaintiff interest – to promote the annulment, execution, civil liability etc. subsequently. The mere indictment of a juridical lie does not have its purpose in civil law because it is not in search of truth at all cost.

https://doi.org/10.24193/SUBBiur.64(2019).1.1
PDF (Limba Română)
HTML (Limba Română)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.