Charge – fixed and floating: Agnew and Another v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council (New Zealand), 5 June 2001 (the “Brumark” case) Charge and Hypothec as Functional Equivalents
PDF
HTML (Limba Română)

Keywords

charge
hypothec
mortgage
functional equivalents charge
hypothec
mortgage
functional equivalents

Abstract

Our endeavour is dedicated to a few security devices. The first part of the current work is called “Words of Introduction”. The second portion takes into account a Privy Council case: Agnew and Another v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council (New Zealand), 5 June 2001 (the Brumark case). The third part briefly focuses on charge and mortgage. The fourth portion, in a succinct manner, describes the hypothec. The fifth and final part shows that charge and hypothec are functional equivalents.

https://doi.org/10.24193/SUBBiur.66(2021).3.2
PDF
HTML (Limba Română)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.