Reflecții asupra hotărârii, din 21 decembrie 2016, a Curții de Justiție de la Luxemburg, pronunțată în cauza „Consiliul Uniunii Europene vs Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia‑el‑hamra et du rio de oro (Front Polisario)”
HTML
PDF

Cuvinte cheie

international public law
liberalisation agreement
principle of self-determination of people
the principle of the relative effect of treaties
Western Sahara
Front Polisario drept internațional
dreptul la autodeterminare
acord de liberalizare
principiul relativității efectelor tratatelor
Sahara Occidentală
Frontul Polisario

Rezumat

The way in which the European Union had approached its trade relations with Morocco was brought to the attention of the European court, asked to rule on the compatibility between the liberalisation agreement of 2012 and European, as well as international public law.

Among others, the task of the Luxembourg Court was to establish the physical area of application of the liberalisation agreement, given that the Kingdom of Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara is not recognised by the EU, by any of its member states or by other countries.

The 2012 ruling of the ECJ conceals behind Morocco's apparent ‘success’ a victory of the Polisario Front, by opening a political breach for the latter, one that may be exploited in future juridical-diplomatic battles on the matter of Western Sahara's territorial sovereignty.

https://doi.org/10.24193/SUBBiur.63(2018).1.4
HTML
PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.